Log In

Forgot Password?
Create New Account

Loading... please wait

Abstract Details

Telemedicine Evaluations in Neuro-ophthalmology During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Patient and Physician Surveys
Neuro-ophthalmology/Neuro-otology
Neuro-ophthalmology/Neuro-otology Posters (7:00 AM-5:00 PM)
001

The novel coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has transformed healthcare. With the need to limit COVID-19 exposures, telemedicine has become an increasingly important format for clinical care. Neuro-ophthalmology faces unique challenges given its dependence on the physical examination. The purpose of this study is to analyze both neuro-ophthalmology physician and patient satisfaction with virtual visits during the time of the COVID-19 pandemic.

To determine whether virtual neuro-ophthalmology visits satisfy patients' needs and provide physicians with adequate clinical information for decision-making.

Telemedicine surveys were administered to 159 patients, and neuro-ophthalmology providers completed 90 surveys. The patient survey consisted of five questions regarding preparation, satisfaction, challenges, and comfort. The provider survey comprised four questions focused on ability to gather clinical information.

Among 159 patients, 104 (65%) were satisfied with the visit, and 149 (94%) felt comfortable asking questions. 74% (68/92) of patients found the instructions easy to understand. Potential areas of improvement included more detailed preparation instructions and better technology (phone positioning, internet connection, and software). Over 80% (45/55) of surveys completed by neuro-ophthalmologists reported conducting an examination that provided enough information for decision-making. Some areas of the neuro-ophthalmologic exam were easy to conduct (range of eye movements, visual acuity, Ishihara color plates, Amsler grids, and red desaturation). Other components proved more difficult (pupil exam, saccades, convergence, oscillations, and smooth pursuit); some were especially challenging (ocular alignment, visual fields, vestibulo-ocular reflex [VOR], VOR suppression, and opto-kinetic nystagmus). Clinicians noted that virtual exams were limited by patient preparation, inability to perform certain parts of the exam (funduscopic and pupillary exams), and technological issues.

Virtual neuro-ophthalmology visits offer most patients with appointments that satisfy their needs and physicians with adequate clinical information for decision-making. Better technology and instructions may improve virtual visits. Some conditions may still require in-person appointments to complete their management.
Authors/Disclosures
Penina Krieger, MD (Penina Krieger)
PRESENTER
Ms. Krieger has nothing to disclose.
Jenna Conway, MD Dr. Conway has nothing to disclose.
Lisena Hasanaj (NYU Langone Medical Center) Ms. Hasanaj has nothing to disclose.
Linus D. Sun, MD, PhD (Denali Therapeutics) Dr. Sun has received personal compensation for serving as an employee of Denali Therapeutics. Dr. Sun has stock in Denali Therapeutics.
No disclosure on file
No disclosure on file
Marc Dinkin, MD (Weill Cornell Neurology and Ophthalmology) Dr. Dinkin has received personal compensation in the range of $10,000-$49,999 for serving as an Expert Witness for WILSON ELSER MOSKOWITZ EDELMAN & DICKER LLP. Dr. Dinkin has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving as an Expert Witness for Rehabilitation Alternative Services, Inc.. Dr. Dinkin has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as an Expert Witness for AMFS / Medical Experts Nationwide. Dr. Dinkin has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as an Expert Witness for Bekman, Marder, Hopper, Malarkey & Perlin, L.L.C.. Dr. Dinkin has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as an Expert Witness for Northwestern Mutual. Dr. Dinkin has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving as an Expert Witness for Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor. Dr. Dinkin has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving as an Expert Witness for Young and Conway . Dr. Dinkin has received personal compensation in the range of $10,000-$49,999 for serving as an Expert Witness for Luks, Santiello.
Cristiano Oliveira, MD (Weill Cornell Medical College) Dr. Oliveira has nothing to disclose.
Devin D. Mackay, MD (Indiana University) Dr. Mackay has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Optum. Dr. Mackay has received personal compensation in the range of $50,000-$99,999 for serving as an Expert Witness for various law firms.
Melissa W. Ko, MD, FAAN (Indiana University Neuroscience Center) Dr. Ko has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as an Editor, Associate Editor, or Editorial Advisory Board Member for AAN. The institution of Dr. Ko has received research support from HRSA. Dr. Ko has received research support from IU Health.
Janet C. Rucker, MD Dr. Rucker has nothing to disclose.
Steven Galetta, MD, FAAN (NYU Langone Medical Center) Dr. Galetta has nothing to disclose.
Laura J. Balcer, MD, MSCE, FAAN (NYU Grossman School of Medicine) An immediate family member of Dr. Balcer has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving as a Consultant for Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. Dr. Balcer has received personal compensation in the range of $50,000-$99,999 for serving as an Editor, Associate Editor, or Editorial Advisory Board Member for North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society.