Log In

Forgot Password?
Create New Account

Loading... please wait

Abstract Details

Time to Confirmed Neuro-infection Diagnoses: Characterization of Current Trends and Implications for Diagnostic Testing Approaches
Infectious Disease
S38 - All Things HIV and ID (4:30 PM-4:42 PM)
006

Timely diagnosis of neuro-infections remains a significant challenge, with the etiology of up to 50% of encephalitis cases and 68% of meningitis cases remaining unidentified despite recent diagnostic advances. Given the global burden and high morbidity and mortality of neuroinfectious disease, understanding factors contributing to efficient diagnosis of these pathogens is essential to limiting spread, providing treatment, and preserving public health.

To identify patterns and characterize limitations of current neuroinfectious disease diagnostic approaches.

Retrospective analysis of 111 hospital admissions of confirmed neuroinfectious disease made between 2010-2018 at Columbia University Irving Medical Center. Demographics and diagnostic studies were collected via chart review.

 

Viral pathogens comprised a majority of confirmed neuro-infections (64.9%, 72/111 patients), followed by bacterial (23.4%, 26/111 patients) and fungal/parasitic (11.7%, 13/111 patients). Viral and fungal pathogens were predominantly detected with CSF PCR/antigen (91.6%, 53.8% respectively), while bacterial infections were largely detected via CSF culture (38.5%). Viral neuro-infections were negatively associated to length of hospitalization (9.4 days +- 11.6 SD) and time to diagnosis (2.4 days +- 5 SD). Fungal/parasitic infections were associated with greatest length of stay (24.9 days +- 19.8 SD), while bacterial infections were associated with longest time to diagnosis (4.9 days +- 8.4 SD). Longer hospitalizations were positively associated with immunosuppression status regardless of infectious etiology. Viral infections required significantly fewer tests sent for diagnosis (24.1 +-11.7 SD) compared to bacterial (32.8 +- 19.2) and fungal/parasitic (37.5 +- 13).

Despite significant advances in the field, consensus about a step-wise diagnostic approach to neuroinfectious diseases is lacking. While current diagnostic procedures have increased reliability for viral pathogen detection, detection of more uncommon pathogens is less effective, potentially contributing to extensive workup and longer hospitalization for these patients. Further studies are required to determine the most comprehensive and high yield diagnostic approach to address these disparities.
Authors/Disclosures
Abhilasha P. Boruah (Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine)
PRESENTER
Ms. Boruah has nothing to disclose.
Rachelle Dugue, MD, PhD Dr. Dugue has nothing to disclose.
Eileen Harrigan, MD (New York University-Langone) Dr. Harrigan has nothing to disclose.
Carla Kim No disclosure on file
Kiran Thakur, MD, FAAN (Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons) The institution of Dr. Thakur has received research support from Center for Disease Control and Prevention.